Really there is nothing magic about loans. Handing a bank 1,000$ and thinking you still have that money rather the the bank owing you 1,000$ is how money is created.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TOTRESNS
Banks did not want to lend out money and lowering the reserve percentage is one of the few tools they have to try to encourage banks making loans. It just so happens that it didn't do cause an uptick in loans
On the other hand, if they didn't need cash on hand to offer loans any random small bank could loan a 1 trillion dollars to someone. They can't because they don't actually have that money.
Consider a bank with 3 billion dollars total and 2 billion in deposits. They only need to care about reserve requirements on 2 billion and can use the other 1 billion for anything because it's their money. In effect cash on hand are assets and deposits are debt. Reserve requirements are just a question of how much leverage they can legally have.
The reserve rate was taken to 0 during covid...
However, even if the bank needed to have deposits or collateral on hand, to stop the "printing money" aspect of new loans, this same thing could happen because homes are collateral on mortgage.
Really I think it mostly driven by the supply demand mismatch, and in particular a belief that local governments will not allow the supply to meet demand.
There's a great recent Fed paper that shows the absolute huge correlation between prices and the supply/demand mismatch. It further shows that demand volatility has been higher than supply volatility so recent effects are explained by that demand volatility.
The only way to solve this is to out build demand and shock prices down. IMHO.