Go generics are not bad

Re:Go generics are not bad by dmitriid on Saturday July 09, 2022 @03:57AM (#32032927)

Don't buy that propaganda, however well-intentioned it is.

At the time when that post was written (including the "no bugs") the web version would continuously fail in the simplest of tasks while having a fraction of the features of the app version.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go generics are not bad by yawaramin on Saturday July 09, 2022 @10:43AM (#32035539)

Any moderately complex app is made up of so many moving pieces, I'm amazed that you can pinpoint those failures specifically to the web frontend piece.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go generics are not bad by dmitriid on Saturday July 09, 2022 @12:36PM (#32036748)

I can't find what I wrote at the time, but there were multiple UI/UX issues and logic bugs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go generics are not bad by yawaramin on Saturday July 09, 2022 @09:13PM (#32040956)

In any case, the point I was making was that languages from academia potentially could scale up in high-velocity and larger teams.

[ Parent | on HN ]