Re:Show HN: PocketBase – Open Source realtime backend in one...
by randomwebdev on Thursday July 07, 2022 @11:23AM
(#32015265)
By default PocketBase uses the local filesystem, but you could also configure a S3 compatible storage (AWS, DigitalOcean, Vultr, etc.) from "Settings > Files Storage > Use S3 storage".
I've started working on the project ~ 3-4 months ago. The last 4 weeks I've taken a longer break from my day-to-day job so that I could finalize the first release.
Re:Show HN: PocketBase – Open Source realtime backend in one...
by endofreach on Thursday July 07, 2022 @12:21PM
(#32015959)
Uploaded files must deviate from „everything in one file“ regardless of using S3, right?
How (and why) would you store user uploads within the binary?
Re:Show HN: PocketBase – Open Source realtime backend in one...
by randomwebdev on Thursday July 07, 2022 @12:31PM
(#32016102)
Uploaded files and your database are stored outside of the binary.
Re:Show HN: PocketBase – Open Source realtime backend in one...
by codegeek on Thursday July 07, 2022 @12:29PM
(#32016068)
yea it was a silly question. It does allow S3 anyway so we are good.
Re:Show HN: PocketBase – Open Source realtime backend in one...
by endofreach on Sunday July 10, 2022 @02:33AM
(#32042361)
My intent was not to point out a „silly question“. I was legitimately interested if there is a reasoning and what a use case for that would be.
Thank you for responding nicely!
One feedback which will probably deviate from everything in 1 file concept but adding an option to upload files to an S3 URL will be awesome. Perhaps a pull request ? I am thinking of use cases like document management using this and if I can have the actual files in S3 (or S3 compatible), that would be a huge plus.
EDIT: I spoke too soon. You already have an option for S3 as I tested the demo. Very cool.
How much work went into this btw ? The github, documentation everything is well done. I envy work like this :)