Re:Monitors.txt - lazy webapp monitoring
by rednaught on Saturday November 05, 2011 @02:20PM
(#3200467)
Fantastic idea. I see humans.txt (http://humanstxt.org/) was an influence. Why not stay in a concise format like that?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Monitors.txt - lazy webapp monitoring
by eliot_sykes on Saturday November 05, 2011 @02:28PM
(#3200493)
I've not been able to figure out an alternative to cucumber that has the same flexibility and readability.
For example, I've not a clue yet on how to improve on this example:
Feature: DuckDuckGo Search
It should continue to kick ass
And I should be able to search
Scenario: Homepage performance
When I go to http://www.duckduckgo.com
Then I should see the page downloaded in less than 0.5 seconds
And I should see the page assets downloaded in less than 2 seconds
Scenario: Search over SSL
Given I go to https://www.duckduckgo.com
When I fill in "q" with "site:news.ycombinator.com"
And I press submit
Then I should be on https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Anews.ycombinator.com
And I should see "Hacker News" within "h2"
Re:Monitors.txt - lazy webapp monitoring
by CJefferson on Saturday November 05, 2011 @03:10PM
(#3200620)
The problem is that this looks tempting, but what if I change:
Then I should see the page downloaded in less than 0.5 seconds
to Then I want the page to download in under a second.
The natural English looks very tempting, but the actual terms you can use are very restrictive.
Re:Monitors.txt - lazy webapp monitoring
by eliot_sykes on Saturday November 05, 2011 @03:15PM
(#3200634)
Thinking monitors.txt would need a validator, plus the monitoring providers can alert customers when they've entered something invalid.