And once you spec it up to the 16 / 512 that it minimally needs to be for any serious work, you are close to the (now discounted) price for the base 14 inch macbook pro at third party resellers. This air is currently way overpriced. At the price it was released it should have had 512 gb storage, which also would have avoided the performance issues. It is still going to sell really well though, so maybe the previous model was just underpriced.

For reference, the slower speed seems to be around 1500 MB/s read and write, compared to 3000 MB/s read speeds for the M1 MBP [0]. While there are definitely applications that would benefit from the extra speed, I wouldn't call 1500 MB/s - ~2.5x the speed of the fastest SATA SSDs - a "performance issue."

[0] https://www.macrumors.com/2022/06/26/base-m2-13-inch-macbook...

Why on earth would you compare it to SATA SSDs?

Common ~$100-150 1 TB M.2 SSDs read 7000 MB/s and write 5000 MB/s.

I agree. I'm torn between the already discounted 14" Pro model and the new MBA. The weight difference is quite considerable, so it's a tough choice if you value portability. I'll have to compare them in the store before I decide.

the air is thinner and lighter though. i think a lot of people (including myself) would consider that tradeoff worth it.

I have a base M1 MBA, I've been running k8s clusters, building stuff with elixir, python and go, doing web dev, all without any issues at all

> Considering the shared GPU memory

Shared memory and unified memory are very, veeery different things.