Last time my RSU cliff came around, I logged into LinkedIn, updated my profile and accepted the backlog of connection requests (and read the flurry of "congratulations on your 4 year anniversary" messages). I almost immediately got Slack messages saying "are you leaving?" But I wanted them to notice; that was the point.

Yeah, though I'd get dinged by that either way since I normally update my bio to include recent projects/tech I've worked with. This way I can hide behind plausible deniability "Oh, I just got around to adding X company to my LinkedIn" if I need to, whereas updating an existing entry is harder to justify (without giving away you are looking). Though I also try not to work for companies that I would need to worry about that.

I doubt they'd actually ask you about it (and thus give you a chance to "explain" yourself), HR would just note you down and you'd be more likely to be laid off, less likely to get promotions approved, etc.

> less likely to get promotions approved

This is not how companies work (at least the ones worth working for). Retention risk is a reflection on their current role, compensation, manager, etc.

We have absolutely promoted high performing employees and/or given them raises even though we knew they were looking at other opportunities.

Companies worth working for aren't stalking their employees in LinkedIn.

I know this is off topic but I'm always confused by the attitude you've mentioned where companies don't actively work to retain staff.

I wonder if there are any courses for managers to train them to think logically about this and not switch into bad decisions based on emotion.

Companies waste so much money on hiring and then deciding to react very slowly to changes in market conditions. If businesses treated their staff like they treat their clients...

Fair, though if I'm looking I'm planning on being gone in 1-2 months max and I'm probably leaving in part due to lack of promotion.

I can’t believe how living a life with this level of scrutiny on how you behave online is acceptable to anyone.

> whereas updating an existing entry is harder to justify (without giving away you are looking)

I don't think it is at all. Indeed, if you're updating it regularly (every 3-4 months, perhaps?) with new project/task stuff, it's simply keeping things fresh in your mind, vs having to try to trawl back 3 years to think about project FOO.

If you only update it once every 2 years, then people can draw more nefarious conclusions.

You can't really reason with algorithms.

You'll be placed in a list with a score next to your name.

> Though I also try not to work for companies that I would need to worry about that.

How do you figure out what kind of software your company uses internally?

> How do you figure out what kind of software your company uses internally?

I work for smaller companies that are more concerned with building instead of turning their workforce into scores on a list.