News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Science vs. Soyence by raint on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @07:37PM (#31995075)
> scientific "advancement" is less of an increase in knowledge than a decrease in falsity

This framing seems extremely useful from a pedagogical standpoint.

Distinguishing scientific units-of-advancement as 'eliminated falsehoods' + 'the tests used to rule out the untruths' would be have been a wonderful correction in my science education.

Re:Science vs. Soyence by woodruffw on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @08:08PM (#31995280)
If you had taken a philosophy of science class, it would have been part of your education. That's cribbed directly from Karl Popper.
Re:Science vs. Soyence by dr_kiszonka on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @11:03PM (#31996230)
It can also be useful to frame findings that rely on statistical analysis as evidence in favor or against some hypothesis, and not interpret them as falsifications.