News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon spending $465M on season 1 of The Lord of the Ring... by WarOnPrivacy on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @12:25PM (#31990284)
I'm genuinely puzzled by this assumption - that the top talent pool largely begins and ends with the best known actors. I'm not debating their obvious talent but I am confident that the industry limits who gets to be well known. One way is by excluding actors who aren't immensely attractive.
Re:Amazon spending $465M on season 1 of The Lord of the Ring... by prepend on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @06:59PM (#31994783)
> assumption - that the top talent pool largely begins and ends with the best known actors.

I don’t think anyone is making this assumption, and certainly not me.

What I’m saying is that in a show with such a big budget, not a single actor is well known or even decently known. That’s unusual and not a good sign. It’s possible that this show is unique in that it has all great actors and is not paying a ton for them. Certainly it’s possible.

But try to think of another show with even a moderate budget that was awesome with an entire cast of “unknowns.”

There are some movies, Kids comes to mind with a new director, writer, and stars like a then unknown Rosario Dawson and Chloe Sevingny. But that budget was like $400k and I think if they had had $40M they would have had different actors.

Re:Amazon spending $465M on season 1 of The Lord of the Ring... by maxerickson on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @07:02PM (#31994799)
Babylon 5 managed okay with little known actors and mediocre effects.