News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Artificial photosynthesis can produce food without sunshine by kibwen on Saturday July 02, 2022 @09:44AM (#31958918)
> If there were free lunches plants would have evolved them.

Well, chlorophyll evolved for survival, not to maximize yields for human agriculture. In the wild, plant growth is bottlenecked on the availability of water and nutrients, and they tend to get way more sunlight than they can use. This is shown by the fact that chlorophyll is green, so plants are actively reflecting away most of the energy from the sun (where green is the dominant wavelength). If wild plants benefited from absorbing all available sunlight, they would be black (or, given the specific chemistries involved, probably a deep purple). In artificial conditions, perhaps one could do better.

Which isn't to say that artificial starch poduction isn't still the way to go, but even in the grim darkness of the future where we're all eating starch capsules for every meal, people will still want a tomato once in a while.

Re:Artificial photosynthesis can produce food without sunshine by sigmoid10 on Sunday July 03, 2022 @06:16AM (#31966559)
>most of the energy from the sun (where green is the dominant wavelength)

That's actually a common misconception that even some older physics textbooks get wrong. You could argue with the same logic (and the same math, just using the frequency domain black body description) that the peak output of the sun is in the infrared. But the truth is that there is no such thing as a dominant wavelength in a continuous density distribution spectrum.

See e.g. here for more info: https://www.oceanopticsbook.info/view/light-and-radiometry/l...

Re:Artificial photosynthesis can produce food without sunshine by verisimi on Saturday July 02, 2022 @10:19AM (#31959192)
Well, I'll know who to blame when all the tomato is gone! :)