Re:Did Functional Programming Get It Wrong (Part 2) – Minecr...
by reinman on Saturday July 02, 2022 @07:04AM
(#31957979)
Do you have any Prolog background? Inference rules? Armstrong's axioms etc.?
Re:Did Functional Programming Get It Wrong (Part 2) – Minecr...
by ungamedplayer on Saturday July 02, 2022 @07:18AM
(#31958064)
For the laymen's in the audience such as myself can you answer the question.
Re:Did Functional Programming Get It Wrong (Part 2) – Minecr...
by reinman on Saturday July 02, 2022 @07:31AM
(#31958139)
(repost from similar question above)
Categories are about composition. Crafting is also about composition - using inference rules. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_theory
The classic schematic representation of X Y Z shown on the above wiki page is basically a crafting rule to create Z. That is, if the AI knows about a "path" (think back to your homotopy training) from X and Y to Z then it can craft a Z from X,Y if it needs to
Yes this is exactly reverse to how we normally think about the caller/callee relationship
Re:Did Functional Programming Get It Wrong (Part 2) – Minecr...
by ungamedplayer on Saturday July 02, 2022 @07:47AM
(#31958230)
I usually just upvote. But I'd like to take the time to thank you for responding. Have a good one.
Could you elaborate on this? What does it have to do with AI?