Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans

Re:Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans by ghshephard on Thursday November 03, 2011 @10:19PM (#3194685)

It's rare that I indulge myself in making a pithy remark on HN, but this is one of those rare times I will, karma be damned.

   You're missing the point.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans by hessenwolf on Friday November 04, 2011 @08:14AM (#3195733)

I agree wholeheartedly with his point. If the populus of HN in general isn't into shamelessly improving productivity in everything, then I am suprised. Aren't we all busy people?

(I watched the first 20 seconds of the clip and realised I only cared because the chick was hot, and the jelly beans could have been cgi for all I care)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans by dandrews on Friday November 04, 2011 @09:58AM (#3196050)

I am reminded why there are so few women in IT.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans by hessenwolf on Friday November 04, 2011 @10:47AM (#3196227)

Valid point. I should have at least phrased it as 'the girl was pretty'. I was a bit yobbo.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans by jrockway on Saturday November 05, 2011 @10:32AM (#3199806)

Oh right, guys in other fields don't like women.

[ Parent | on HN ]