News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions by itsoktocry on Thursday June 30, 2022 @01:40PM (#31935864)
>Their logic can be consistent and they can still be partisans, looking to implement a specific agenda.

While your logic is consistent, unbiased, agenda-free and non-partisan.

>because they support the outcomes these rulings enact.

While the fact that you do not support these outcomes has no bearing in your opinions on the matter.

Re:Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions by philosopher1234 on Thursday June 30, 2022 @01:43PM (#31935912)
I never claimed either of those things. I am biased too. We are all biased. We should be discussing openly our opinions of these outcomes, not wasting time hiding behind procedural arguments.