News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world by powerslacker on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @01:27PM (#31923178)
Your hysteria about Republicans isn't helping your case one bit. A full facist takeover? Most Republicans are barely competent. They couldn't takeover an unarmed city state if they tried.
Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world by AlexandrB on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @01:30PM (#31923215)
They managed to take over the Supreme Court just fine.

They don't need to be extraordinarily competent. Just more competent than the Democrats.

Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world by jaycroft on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @01:36PM (#31923292)
Just this month, the barely competent Republicans have managed to:

Allow unlimited contributions of money to candidates after being elected

Severely limit ability to sue government employees for outside-of-duty infringements on civil liberties ("Absolute Immunity")

Reclassify Miranda as a suggestion and not a right

Overturn Roe

Allow schools to establish religious practices

Neuter the Voting Rights Act

Sounds like the takeover might already be complete.

Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world by time_to_smile on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @01:38PM (#31923331)
I used to claim the same thing about Roe v. Wade. I remembered even in 2016 I thought, as bad as things looked, it was impossible for Roe v Wade to seriously be under threat.

I typically think I'm a fairly cynical, pessimistic person, but the last 5 years or so has taught me that I'm not nearly cynical and pessimistic enough.

When you look at the history of fascists take overs, it's usually done clumsily by a bunch of goons and thugs. It doesn't take brilliant political strategy to undermine democracy, and democracy is far more fragile than most of us are willing to believe.

Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world by vcgdfgfgfdg on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @02:24PM (#31923888)
Roe v Wade was always under threat. Even RBG knew it was a bad ruling.
Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world by kennywinker on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @01:31PM (#31923233)
They did try. It was barely a year and a half ago, not sure how you could forget already. And they're going to try again in 2024.
Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world by tzs on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @01:34PM (#31923266)
> Most Republicans are barely competent. They couldn't takeover an unarmed city state if they tried.

It doesn't take most. It only takes a few if they are well placed. Read the article he linked to and in particular think about point #7 there.

Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world by pempem on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @01:31PM (#31923240)
Or the capitol despite trying?

While I agree with you, I would say there are definitely indications that fringe elements, which are being embraced and becoming leadership in the mainstream, enjoy violent terror as a tool.

Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world by powerslacker on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @01:43PM (#31923404)
Holy guacamole some of y'all live in fantasy land. Facism is a real thing and it's actually dangerous. Like millions upon millions in death camps dangerous. Tug-of-war on Constitutional interpretation should be expected. All that has happened w/Roe v. Wade is that States now get to decide whether or not to allow abortion, and under what circumstances, in their own territory. That was the case for most of the nations history.

You are giving cover to REAL fascists by muddying the term.

Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world by thomassmith65 on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @01:40PM (#31923355)
And besides, it can't happen here /s
Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world by alangibson on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @01:34PM (#31923263)
> Most Republicans are barely competent

Clearly true, but the opposition parties are even more incompetent. Also, they are cohesive and motivated, and that's enough.