News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by unethical_ban on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @12:00AM (#31916351)
Reading your comment history, you have a very bad faith manner of making your points. You speak of hubris to me but nothing in your tone suggests humility, decency or the willingness to debate with people as if they are partners in the community. You're looking for a fight. You aren't looking for solutions.

No, someone would not be immediately thrown in an incarceration pit if someone stole their gun on a Saturday afternoon and killed someone on a Saturday night. Jesus, this is a HN thread. It's a whiteboard, not legislative text. Open your mind.

Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by parineum on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @12:24AM (#31916487)
> Reading your comment history,

Ahh, the true sign of someone arguing in good faith.

> you have a very bad faith manner of making your points.

As opposed to your "stay calm and passive aggressive" nonsense.

> nothing in your tone suggests humility, decency or the willingness to debate with people as if they are partners in the community. You're looking for a fight. You aren't looking for solutions.

I'm not willing to debate your insane proposal. There's no humility here because I'm right. You're not going to change my mind because it's a stupid idea. I'm not looking for a fight, your idea is dumb. It has no corollary in any situation where something deadly is stolen (cars, prescription drugs, literally anything). To make an exception for the one thing that is constitutionally guaranteed is the most absurd way of going about such a thing. Not to mention the fact that it's completely _impractical_ politically, even if you could convince someone that it was a good idea.

I have the solution, stop proposing this bad idea.