News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Attorney General. Parent comment

Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by mulmen on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @04:52PM (#31912870)
I made no error. You seem to have lost track of the context in this thread. I replied to a comment (not yours) that essentially said guns come from the black market instead of being stolen. I pointed out through a rhetorical device the possibility that the black market sells stolen products and so both are true. You then replied to that rhetorical.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by falcrist on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @05:50PM (#31913493)
I haven't lost track of anything. You asked a question and I replied to that.

As far as your rhetorical device, I'm sorry but theft isn't the only way firearms get into that market.

You're trying to attribute arguments to me that I never made, and I'd appreciate it if you'd stop.

Thanks.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by mulmen on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @06:03PM (#31913658)
> You're trying to attribute arguments to me that I never made, and I'd appreciate it if you'd stop.

I explicitly did the exact opposite of that.

You are clearly confused but at this point I don’t think I can help you.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by falcrist on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @08:41PM (#31915054)
No. You did exactly that. I'm asking you politely to please stop that and the condescension. It's ineffective and rude.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by mulmen on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @09:31PM (#31915413)
You’re clearly still confused and I think that’s why you are being defensive.

I replied to sha256sum’s (not you!) comment at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31912312 with a rhetorical question. You then answered it as if it were an actual question. Since that wasn’t the reason for the question I then explained my interpretation of the original post (that again, you did not make).

Since that point you seem to believe I claimed sha256sum’s post was yours but in fact I did no such thing and actually disclaimed it specifically.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by falcrist on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @09:33AM (#31919880)
No. I'm clearly not confused. I know who you replied to. I'm not responding to them.

I'm tired of the disingenuous way you've approached this conversation, and your awful attitude.

As I said in my last comment, you need to cut it out.

[ Parent | on HN ]