News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why hasn't Middle Earth had an Industrial Revolution? by ghaff on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @08:34AM (#31906826)
That assumes homo sapiens levels of childbirth however. As a number of comments touch on, a lot of the lack of technological advance could be hand-waved away as a result of low birthrates and a generally low population. You could also perhaps factor in a general societal distaste for technology although human history suggests that societies which can't or won't create technology are overwhelmed by societies that do.
Re:Why hasn't Middle Earth had an Industrial Revolution? by gostsamo on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @08:55AM (#31907053)
I mean, we can all say "magic" and not think about it, but the fun here is in thinking and the hand-waving is not in the spirit of it.
Re:Why hasn't Middle Earth had an Industrial Revolution? by erikpukinskis on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @12:10PM (#31909556)
It’s not just magic. In the First Age children were more of a vanity project… every creature in existence had a downright biblical origin.

Men don’t even exist until the Second Age, and “cities” at that time are basically just family settlements, with maybe a few dozen generations of men. And at first they’re below replacement rate. Look at the family tree of Beor: http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/B%C3%ABor#Genealogy… no one is having three kids. It’s two or one.

The Third Age is only a few thousand years later. There’s just not enough time at those kind of birth rates to blanket a continent the way humans have.

Re:Why hasn't Middle Earth had an Industrial Revolution? by ghaff on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @09:23AM (#31907364)
I'm not sure it's hand-wavy "magic." The essay is talking about things that are different in Middle Earth that could have led to the lack of an industrial revolution by the Third Age. Lower population growth (and slower population recovery after plagues and wars) seem like a pretty plausible factor.

It's also plausible that societal advancement was also just slower than with us when the author seems to assume it would be expected to advance at the same pace. (i.e. it's taken ME longer to reach a medieval level of advancement.) Certainly happened with plenty of areas in our world for geographical determination and other reasons--though, by effectively modeling ME on Europe and giving it horses and AFAIK familiar crops, that's a harder case to make.

Re:Why hasn't Middle Earth had an Industrial Revolution? by inawarminister on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @07:45AM (#31918826)
Uh, the humans of Gondor were descended from Numenoreans, who were descended from the Houses of Edain, men who morphed from Neolithic kit technology to High Medieval (pre-plate armour and gunpowder) by being uplifted by Noldorian elves in Beleriand.

Unlike the humans from a certain other famous series, we knew the background of Gondorians all the way to their earliest fathers around year... 300? 800? Of the first age of the Sun.

Now, discounting that... I agree, ME has really low population growth. Might be caused by Gondorians and Arnorians living to 200+, 300+ years old earlier, when their culture were established; when the blood grows thin and they live like normal humans, their cultures ossified already; 40 - 50 year old normal human grooms and brides aren't as productive as 80-100 year old Numenorian grooms and brides.