Re:Angular without SSR is faster than Next.js with SSR
by InsaneOstrich on Monday June 27, 2022 @05:04PM
(#31900772)
It's very opinionated compared to the alternatives and it has a "batteries included" kind of approach. There's a "right" way to do things and you don't need to pull in a lot of third party libraries for basic functionality. The native typescript support is really nice too.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Angular without SSR is faster than Next.js with SSR
by jeremycarter on Monday June 27, 2022 @05:09PM
(#31900831)
I've worked on react apps where some features use different routers, state stores and component syntax. Angular gives you 2 ways to solve problems and keeps things consistent and on the rails.
Re:Angular without SSR is faster than Next.js with SSR
by thm76 on Monday June 27, 2022 @09:40PM
(#31903158)
Having stuff included does have advantages, but, in my opinion, some of those included things in Angular are really badly designed (I'm looking at you, Forms)
I never use Angular for personal projects, and I have been using TypeScript exclusively for years. I.e. other libraries work really well with TypeScript as well (sometimes actually better than Angular, in my experience)