News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to set junior employees up for success in remote by sweetheart on Monday June 27, 2022 @10:05AM (#31894758)
Pair programming is a fantastic tool. Why the snark?
Re:How to set junior employees up for success in remote by prepend on Monday June 27, 2022 @10:20AM (#31894943)
I like pair programming and think I learned a ton by being the junior “driving” while the senior was “navigating.”

But I’ve also had some nightmare scenarios with people who just massively slack and do nothing. I worked with someone who wanted to “navigate” in 10/10 sessions and never said anything. They just watched me do stuff, didn’t respond to questions, didn’t work on docs, didn’t look stuff up. It was weird.

Mismatches like this made me eventually stop doing it as the team ended up separating out to pairs of superstars and pairs who did nothing. And it demoralized people.

Re:How to set junior employees up for success in remote by pyb on Monday June 27, 2022 @11:38AM (#31896084)
That's why people should not be forced to pair program. (and I personally favor pairing)
Re:How to set junior employees up for success in remote by bragr on Monday June 27, 2022 @10:27AM (#31895040)
Clearly this person is not throwing shade a pair programming, but lazy employees who might skate by doing lots of "pair programming" without pulling their weight.

I've come across people that are very good at getting "help" on their work to the point that they do very little work.

Re:How to set junior employees up for success in remote by ratww on Monday June 27, 2022 @10:19AM (#31894925)
GP isn't talking about Pair programming in general. Pair programming is great. But quote-unquote "Pair Programming", where only one person does the work... not really. Been there done that.