News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Meta bans staff from open discussion of Roe vs. Wade. Parent comment

Re:Meta bans staff from open discussion of Roe vs. Wade by thrown_22 on Sunday June 26, 2022 @10:38AM (#31884422)
>Extrapolating from that to interracial marriage, which rests on a different and vastly firmer legal ground, is a dirty smear tactic against a man who is himself in an interracial marriage.

You're calling him so morally bankrupt that he would only vote impartially on laws that don't impact him personally, while he would vote with his self interest in all other cases.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta bans staff from open discussion of Roe vs. Wade by rayiner on Sunday June 26, 2022 @11:07AM (#31884666)
You stated upthread: “while having your interracial marriage dissolved.”

That suggests that Thomas would vote to overturn Loving, not that he would avoid it out of his own self interest.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta bans staff from open discussion of Roe vs. Wade by thrown_22 on Sunday June 26, 2022 @11:28AM (#31884850)
Yes, I'm well aware I am not you.
[ Parent | on HN ]