News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects by pshirshov on Sunday June 26, 2022 @07:24AM (#31882951)
> It really depends on the specific situation. Public space is for everyone’s enjoyment. Unfortunately, some people take advantage of their right to the space in a way that detracts from everyone. Take a park for example. Typically, a great place to take your kids. However, if someone $PROPERTY loiters in the park, it suddenly becomes a much worse place for everyone else. Technically, being $PROPERTY in a public place isn’t a crime. This person is well within their rights to use the public space. But in many cases, people like this form a small minority that ruins the public space for everyone. Discouraging this type of person is actually maximizing the utility of public space.

PROPERTY={high on heroin | fat | ugly | gay | disabled | autistic | ... }

Re:Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects by r3muxd on Sunday June 26, 2022 @08:12AM (#31883238)
Can you really compare being strung out on heroin with being ugly, though?
Re:Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects by pshirshov on Sunday June 26, 2022 @05:56PM (#31888454)
Yeah, in my country of origin exactly this rhetoric is used against every minority, from gay people to disabled people. Yeah, they intentionally make places _inaccessible_ for disabled and push autistic children out of schools.