A favourite example I have to deal with often is when the path has to narrow, so they put up signs telling all cyclists to dismount. I pass through a few of these often, and whenever a cyclist obeys the sign it creates immediate congestion because pushing a bike is slow and takes up more space. Then you get a cascade effect of pedestrians stepping into car traffic to avoid the bottleneck.
Another is rumble strips to slow down bikes at pedestrian crossings. It doesn't slow anyone enough to prevent incident, and tends to give pedestrians an illusion of priority so they stop looking for bikes in the path. Not to mention being uncomfortable enough to discourage using the bike path at all, and shaking lights out of position.
Do you by chance mean those things on the ground with the raised dots/grooves? [1]
Those are actually for helping the blind navigate it. If it is something different JUST to slow bikes though... That just makes me go WTF.
[1] https://cdn.w600.comps.canstockphoto.com/man-walking-on-yell...
But there is a guideline that you should only go at the speed from which you can stop from within the visible part of the road.
Can you link to an example?
Hungary has an elegant, low-tech solution. Broad white stripes are painted ~100 m apart on the shoulder of the road. Fixed signs indicate the allowed speed - if you can see three, it’s 130, two is 110, one is 80 (or something like that - it’s been a few years).
And yes, German signage certainly does weather dependency, speed limits with "Zusatzzeichen 1052-36" are quite frequent (I think it's put up everywhere the surface doesn't drain as good as it should, e.g. if surface angle changes slightly from the ground setting after construction)
Actually turns out they're a terrible idea, tbh.
You mean like the "traffic calming measures" most urban roads have, to slow down cars?
Now replace cyclist with motorist.
Would it be in anyway acceptable for someone to plonk an unmarked concrete block in the middle of an unlit road?