News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Texas repeatedly raises pollution limits for Cheniere LNG... by reaperducer on Saturday June 25, 2022 @11:01AM (#31875844)
Lots of articles in the Texas newspapers over the last few years about these big petrochemical complexes being habitual, and flagrant polluters.

The environmental regulator in Texas is currently being re-evaluated as part of a regular process to determine if it's effective. The state agency that did the review came up with the conclusion "no, it isn't."

From what I've read, the regulating agency is widely seen as a rubber stamp operation for the petrochemical industry. Part of the codified process involves issuing a draft pollution permit before public input is even sought. Very backward from almost every other state I've studied.

Also interesting, there have been dozens and dozens of articles about massive methane discharges all around the state from various pipelines. Until recently, it's been impossible to see methane dumps in near-real-time. But now that there are satellites that can see the plumes, they're being detected all the time. Rather than flush the methane out of a pipeline into storage before maintenance, the pipeline companies have been just venting it into the atmosphere.

Amazingly, even though the methane dumps coincide exactly with the pipeline maintenance schedules, and the satellites document the plumes, the pipeline companies maintain their stance of, "Oh, yeah? Prove it."

My observation over the last 20 years is that while Texas is slowly getting greener, as the process progresses and technology improves, we're learning just how dirty it was to start with.

Re:Texas repeatedly raises pollution limits for Cheniere LNG... by mistrial9 on Saturday June 25, 2022 @11:31AM (#31876049)
insights welcome on the regulatory capture in TX; spin addition on the story from me might be -- that "we're learning just how dirty it was" is not the case in a system of systems. News stories somehow imply a common, collective understanding with a collective voice of discovery, but this is an illusion maintained for civil progress. Multiple individual researchers in every generation, and some institutions and business interests, not only knew how dirty it was, but went to great lengths to tell anyone, do something, make it stop or change. It is a particular brand of militant, obstinate and dominant management style, cherished in Texas politics, that repeatedly ignore and in fact mock opposition. It is a sport among them to bait and goad environmentalists, undermine the agenda, and lay blame on ordinary economic and political trends on greens.

"we're learning just how dirty it was" speaks from the calm policy podium, but is not sufficient in this case of environmental crime.

Re:Texas repeatedly raises pollution limits for Cheniere LNG... by Pv9KKy3 on Saturday June 25, 2022 @01:01PM (#31876835)
"flagrant polluters."

This is such a sloppy take, backed by no data. If anyone would spend 10 minutes analyzing GHG and other emissions they would find that BURNING / USING these products is what produces the most emissions. So 40 million+ tons per year easily (in the US) of JUST carbon monoxide. FAR worse globally. Billions of tons of CO2. And heads up, LNG is much CLEANER than many other fuels currently in use, particularly coal.

"We are defending our communities from being obliterated,” says John Serna, a resident of Portland, Gregory, and Ingleside.

Hardly - look at ukraine for what the word "obliterated" means.

Re:Texas repeatedly raises pollution limits for Cheniere LNG... by throw0101a on Sunday June 26, 2022 @11:22AM (#31884799)
> The environmental regulator in Texas is currently being re-evaluated as part of a regular process to determine if it's effective. The state agency that did the review came up with the conclusion "no, it isn't."

More guberment? Feh! Just let The Market™ decide. /s