News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by kaba0 on Saturday June 25, 2022 @03:29AM (#31873304)
> The need to live in the mother’s uterus for approximately forty weeks is also not an extraordinary measure, in the way that the term is generally used. It is a basic human need

Just as possibly the most basic human right there can be - bodily autonomy.

There is no monetary help supplied by the father that can even measure up to the health implications of a pregnancy, money can’t buy/fix health.

Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by mikevm on Saturday June 25, 2022 @04:29AM (#31873498)
Very convenient of you to leave out the important sentence that came before:

>> In the usual case, where pregnancy did not result from sexual assault, the child himself, and his need for shelter and nourishment in the womb, is a direct result of actions taken voluntarily by both parents.

> Just as possibly the most basic human right there can be - bodily autonomy.

You have bodily autonomy. You can choose to have or not to have sex (which may or may not lead to pregnancy). Abortion is a medical procedure and is not a human right.

On the other hand, when it came to the COVID vaccine, the Dems were very quick to ignore the bodily autonomy argument based on bogus claims.

An example from the Australian Human Rights Act: > No-one may be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation or treatment without his or her free consent.