News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by lolinder on Friday June 24, 2022 @04:55PM (#31869174)
> What happens when a deadbeat dad is the only match for a child with organ failure? Why shouldn’t they be compelled to give up an organ to keep their offspring alive?

If you can come up with a way to loan someone an organ for 9 months and then get it back when you're done with it, then this argument would be coherent. As is, I'd re-evaluate it if you have any intention of persuading someone on the opposite side of this issue.

Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by human_person on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @10:08PM (#31915657)
Considering pregnancy can result in death (at a higher rate than kidney donation as noted elsewhere in the thread) as well as countless other long term conditions your 9 month limit doesn’t really make sense. But let’s say you could loan out a kidney for a few months, would you really find it acceptable for the state to forcibly seize your kidney to keep someone else alive?
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by peter422 on Friday June 24, 2022 @05:00PM (#31869245)
Persuasion isn’t that important when the vast majority of the public already agrees with you.