Re:Hardening macOS
by imwillofficial on Friday June 24, 2022 @07:57PM
(#31871011)
I don’t think this is a unfair statement to make.
The “petty threats” make up the large majority of risk for average users. Faaaar larger.
If your threat model includes worry about state level actors, Tails or QubesOS is the only thing I would recommend
Oh, for sure. Microsoft is far-and-away one of the worst handlers of data, Yahoo and Google aren't much better either. This is a strawman though, and while it provides a nice bit of context around the rest of the status-quo for privacy, it doesn't absolve Apple of the fact that their security is half-theater, and the other half has convenient backdoors and workarounds for the involved parties. Given that the topic of this article is "Hardening MacOS" and not "Reviewing The Standards of Security in Big Tech", I chose to focus on Apple's particular issues, especially since the issues with those other companies are so well-documented on HN.
> It's not private for local users, and that is bad.
This is what I used that point to illustrate. Apple claims that privacy is a human right, yet apparently not all humans are created equal? It's a strange bit of hypocrisy, one they could easily avoid by refusing to negotiate with countries that take advantage of them.