News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by morelisp on Friday June 24, 2022 @03:11PM (#31867884)
The latter, but if I'm wrong please don't link to it.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by hirako2000 on Friday June 24, 2022 @04:35PM (#31868967)
You have problems eating thinking of "`races` mixing" ? What about this: the entire humanity is, that is all specimen, including yourself, is the outcome of in and outbreeding between countless ethnies, groups of different skin colors, cultures and even religion/folklore followers.

If you have a digesting problem with this, we may just call it nature but your comment is what could put many not at ease. That being said, I would at least guess we agree on the ruling that it gets us closer to nature and some commonly accepted ethic with regards to human life and procreation.

Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by checker on Friday June 24, 2022 @05:34PM (#31869643)
I support your position, but I'm pretty sure he was cracking a tasteless joke at the thought of the specific people of Clarence and Ginni getting it on rather than all people of mixed races.

It's a reddit-level comment that doesn't add anything to the discussion.

Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by morelisp on Friday June 24, 2022 @05:44PM (#31869791)
> It's a reddit-level comment that doesn't add anything to the discussion.

That still makes it a rhetorical step up from Thomas's concurrence.

Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by cplanas on Friday June 24, 2022 @05:13PM (#31869379)
I think he meant particularly Ginny and Clarence Thomas, not people of different races in general.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by morelisp on Friday June 24, 2022 @05:21PM (#31869479)
I'll compromise. Justices can miscegenate or plot to overthrow an election, but not both.