News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by ars on Friday June 24, 2022 @02:19PM (#31867040)
To use your example, you can't demand I give you a kidney, but once you have it (and assuming you immediately die without it), I can't take it back.

Body autonomy is great and all, but it doesn't excuse murder.

Like I said: I'm not required to save you, but I also can't kill you.

Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by dsego on Friday June 24, 2022 @02:41PM (#31867438)
> Body autonomy is great and all, but it doesn't excuse murder.

But it's not murder if I wake up in the middle of the procedure, walk away, and you die on the operating table.

Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by ars on Friday June 24, 2022 @03:19PM (#31868033)
Changing the scenario midway does not help anyone. Unless you are implying you agree with me, and wish to discuss a new scenario.

To me the lines are clear: You don't have to take action to save his life, but you also can not kill him by your actions. i.e. if everyone froze at this moment and did nothing - would he live, or die?

Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by dsego on Friday June 24, 2022 @04:31PM (#31868920)
I wasn't changing the scenario.