How is what I said a misrepresentation? I used the word "flawed" and I think it perfectly represents her opinion. She acknowledged that the reasoning behind it opened up the door to it being overturned, which is something that many if not most legal scholars agreed with. And she was clearly correct, as evidenced by today's ruling.

Of course she wouldn't have voted to overturn it, but I never said or meant to imply that she would have.