News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by scarmig on Friday June 24, 2022 @02:03PM (#31866747)
How far does this extend? To riff off the classic example, what happens if there were a hypothetical medical condition where a violinist needed to be attached to your bloodstream for nine months and would die if removed beforehand, and you sign a contract agreeing to it before deciding at month seven that you've had enough and cut her off, killing her? Have you committed a moral crime there? And if so, should you face legal punishment for it (a separate question)?
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by dariusj18 on Friday June 24, 2022 @02:09PM (#31866852)
This is a contrived example, but a pretty obvious answer given PC's stance. You can enter into the contact and would need be prepared for civil liability upon breach, or criminal if you entered into the contract under false pretenses. Intent would be a major part of deciding the criminal action. If you could be shown to have the intent of someone's death, then that would be murder, otherwise no.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by Levitz on Friday June 24, 2022 @02:29PM (#31867226)
It is a contrived example, but it has a reason for it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Defense_of_Abortion

Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by dariusj18 on Friday June 24, 2022 @04:25PM (#31868843)
Seems pretty heavily modified from the source, but even the source isn't super relevant because it is trying to use though experiments to determine the morality of the act, however Roe and this subsequent decision (tenuously) are based on legal justification.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by scarmig on Friday June 24, 2022 @04:57PM (#31869203)
Thought experiments are useful as intuition pumps, and very widely used in philosophy. And the particular argument I was responding to was about a moral argument for complete bodily autonomy.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by ModernMech on Saturday June 25, 2022 @01:46PM (#31877193)
As a violinist, I’m confused as to why the person is a violinist is relevant at all.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by digdugdirk on Friday June 24, 2022 @02:14PM (#31866953)
Going along with your scenario - you'd have a discussion with your medical professional (who you've been seeing since the start of this process) and explore the possible outcomes with their guidance. In this specific scenario, you'd line up another volunteer host and transfer the contracted host-duties over to them.