Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade
by DangitBobby on Friday June 24, 2022 @12:21PM
(#31864821)
> The law actually calls the fetus a "child," and takes foregranted that the woman "is with child"
And yet... If the woman is harmed, it's treated as if you harmed a human (eye for an eye), but if the fetus is harmed, there's a fine. It's quite clear that the fetus is not anywhere near the same importance in this law, not that this should have anything to do with modern law.
And yet... If the woman is harmed, it's treated as if you harmed a human (eye for an eye), but if the fetus is harmed, there's a fine. It's quite clear that the fetus is not anywhere near the same importance in this law, not that this should have anything to do with modern law.