That would almost be ok if corporations weren't allowed to lobby the government, have their employees, owners or board members go work in politics or have other types of influence on politicians.
But they have tremendous influence on the laws that they themselves ostensibly have to follow.
Not to mention that:
- even when they break laws they tend to get just a slap on the wrist
- the corporate execs responsible for the lawbreaking rarely go to jail
- even if they're unlucky enough to go to jail the jails tend to be cushy country clubs
- execs have golden parachutes that let them cash out even if they screw the company, and can easily get jobs elsewhere (not that the people at the top who bear ultimate responsibility for the company even have to work another day in their life)
- corporations manipulate voters' opinions through (perfectly legal) advertising, PR, media ownership/influence, sponsorship, greenwashing, astroturfing, etc
I'm curious where this view comes from. The last time I checked, corporations are composed of people, and people are fraught with opinion.
Corporations should operate within the confines of non-discrimination law. If these business opportunities aren’t open to their Jewish or female employees, they are partaking in discrimination.
Until we start crucifying corporate lobbyists in the public square, mass criticism is the only weapon we have.
As it should be. Corporations should not have many opinions and should operate within the law. If corporate leaders or employees don’t like it then they can spend their free time lobbying or campaigning for politicians that want to change things. Only after the law is changed should the company make a change. Until then, business as usual.