News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook says Apple is too powerful – they're right by uncomputation on Monday June 20, 2022 @11:42AM (#31811664)
This doesn’t make sense. You wouldn’t have an Electron app on iOS anyways. If you used Electron for desktop, you would generate an iOS bundle for the App Store but OP is suggesting just a web app in the vein of HN, just accessed via the browser. The only thing you would use Electron for is desktop but, also like HN, nobody accesses tumblr via a desktop app to begin with. They use a browser.
Re:Facebook says Apple is too powerful – they're right by Aldo_MX on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @12:52AM (#31820025)
> You wouldn’t have an Electron app on iOS anyways.

You're missing the forest for the trees. The issue is not building an app specifically with Electron, but building an app which requires a browser. The browser is expensive in terms of resource usage, which results in less battery life.

Using a browser is OK for an app intended for a light usage session (like booking a flight). But not OK for an app which is intended for heavy usage sessions (like browsing pictures in an infinite timeline).

There's a reason Slack (which already has a reputation of impacting your battery life) decided to create a native app for mobile instead of using an Electron-like framework like Capacitor[1].

[1]: https://capacitorjs.com/

Re:Facebook says Apple is too powerful – they're right by woojoo666 on Monday June 20, 2022 @05:07PM (#31815951)
From the article

> Apple’s restrictions on third-party browsers, and the limitations it puts on Safari/WebKit (its own browser tools) have hobbled “web apps,”

Though I'm sure you can also ask many product managers how well native apps on iOS perform due to web apps (many companies have data on both). For whatever reason, users prefer native apps