Re:Samsung Busted for Cheating TV Test Benchmarks
by oynqr on Monday June 20, 2022 @01:01AM
(#31806453)
Having the kernel source won't really help with a locked bootloader.
Re:Samsung Busted for Cheating TV Test Benchmarks
by pabs3 on Monday June 20, 2022 @01:24AM
(#31806593)
Thats why the GPL requires the ability to install as well:
https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2021/mar/25/install-gplv2/ https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2021/jul/23/tivoization-and-t... https://events19.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017...
Re:Samsung Busted for Cheating TV Test Benchmarks
by oynqr on Monday June 20, 2022 @02:00AM
(#31806791)
Yeah, try to argue in front of a court that this somehow covers private signing keys.
Re:Samsung Busted for Cheating TV Test Benchmarks
by pabs3 on Monday June 20, 2022 @02:29AM
(#31806970)
I don't think the GPL covers signing keys, just some mechanism for installation. Allowing addition of additional signing keys is a good way to do it, just like UEFI Secure Boot does things. There are also plenty of phone vendors who allow bootloader unlock after wiping the device DRM/etc keys too.
Re:Samsung Busted for Cheating TV Test Benchmarks
by spacemanmatt on Monday June 20, 2022 @03:57AM
(#31807473)
Vizio product quality is so bad I don't expect mine to work 2 years past its ship date. The TV is truly disposable.
https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html