News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:HAL/S Syntax by ncmncm on Sunday June 19, 2022 @09:12PM (#31805189)
Except, that wasn't at all what we call a compiler; she just used the name compiler for something that clearly was not. Admittedly, she was first to use the name, but word coinage is not a thing we recognize as a fundamental achievement. Hal didn't call his thing a "compiler", but it clearly was one, by the modern definition.

(Its output was subroutine calls, but that is a matter for optimization. When your compiler has to fit in 1K machine words, you make compromises.)

Re:HAL/S Syntax by jecel on Monday June 20, 2022 @03:02PM (#31814247)
In English "to compile" is defined as "produce (something, especially a list, report, or book) by assembling information collected from other sources." which seems like a good description of what A0 to A2 did.

It is a pity that when people started to build translators they didn't use that name but instead kept the now obsolete term "compiler".

Re:HAL/S Syntax by ncmncm on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @05:46AM (#31822114)
Look up "etymological fallacy".

Words don't have a "true meaning" independent of how they are used.

Re:HAL/S Syntax by zeckalpha on Monday June 20, 2022 @01:08AM (#31806488)
I would encourage to update the Wikipedia page accordingly.