Re:Bunny fonts – privacy respecting drop-in replacement for ...
by lolinder on Sunday June 19, 2022 @06:53PM
(#31804314)
I don't think it's laziness. My conscious brain knows that it's anachronistic, but I still have the instinct to use a CDN for the shared caching between sites. Obviously, browser privacy changes mean that isn't a valid reason any more, but for me the instinct is still there.
Re:Bunny fonts – privacy respecting drop-in replacement for ...
by kevin_thibedeau on Sunday June 19, 2022 @09:24PM
(#31805270)
Sites will setup a CDN to serve their own custom assets, but fonts? nope not doable. It's 100% laziness.
Re:Bunny fonts – privacy respecting drop-in replacement for ...
by lolinder on Sunday June 19, 2022 @10:03PM
(#31805543)
I'm not talking about setting up a CDN for custom assets, I'm talking about using something like jsdelivr or Google Fonts. Back in the day using those was a "best practice" because most people would (in theory) already have whatever font/library you're using cached. A lot of people, myself included, still have that as a habit that takes conscious effort to avoid falling into.
The silliness of this is that someone is going through the effort to set up hosting for a website but hosting the fonts is just too difficult and has to be delegated to a third party. The laziness of webdevs never fails to astound.