Whichever way you put it, it's either a flawed process or a weird turn of phrase by Ive.
Have you ever heard of "Good/Cheap/Fast — pick two"?
An unqualified "best" means it's the best. It was an unfortunate turn of phrase by Ive, a person known to make mistakes, as pointed out several times here on HN.
No not really, real life does not work that, you can be best in some aspect while not the best in other aspects but for some reason you dont seem to understand nuance, its probably your hatred for Ive that seems to be clouding your judgement.
> its probably your hatred for Ive that seems to be clouding your judgement
Wow. Hatred. I don't even know the guy, how can I hate him? I don't own a Mac, I just use one provided by my work. I don't own an iphone. I really don't pay much attention to Ive at all, just pointing out a flaw in his wording.
Hatred. Really. Is that how you normally debate?
Is that how you normally debate by making personal attacks? You have already made up your mind the Ive makes many mistakes.
> Maybe Ive should have been more careful about his wording -- which was my point, after all!
and my point was that there are nuances which for some reason you still dont understand because you have already made up your mind about Ive, so lets agree to disagree because you are not going to change your opinion.
> You have already made up your mind the Ive makes many mistakes.
I made my mind just like any person would: by looking at past behavior. This is not a sin, is how human judgment works.
> you still dont understand
Ok then. Good luck with your debate tactics.
I dont need luck when facts are on my side. Good luck understanding nuance in the future.
That's not a personal attack.
> you have already made up your mind that whatever he does is a mistake
Uh, no.
As I said, good luck with that.
As I said, Good luck understanding nuance in the future.
Good luck, and good bye.
Good luck to you too, you do need it.
You also seem obsessed with Ive.
What does it say about your obsession that you're continuing this thread?
What's funny is that you overstepped the line with the "personal attack" claim -- you know it, I know it -- but you're too stubborn to back down now, so you resort to... making personal attacks.
I still don't understand why you said goodbye if you had so much hatred inside you which you want to take out.
I see you enjoy insulting other people. One might even call it... hatred.
But yes, I do feel harassed by an online troll: you.
And also I'm a troll because I didn't take it in stride when you started saying I'm "insulting with my hatred" someone I don't know?
Did I get this right, is this what offended you so much?
I'm sorry I hurt you so much, you poor thing.
You are a troll because you said goodbye but when someone proved you wrong, you could not handle it because of your hatred.
You should feel sorry for yourself, you need to see someone to handle your hate which is festering inside you.
I missed the part where you "proved me wrong", I guess I need my glasses!
Tell me more about hatred, please.
Read my comments again with your glasses.
Could you please link to your comment where you "proved me wrong", for my own edification?
Did you get your glasses and read my previous comments again?
The best idea might be too expensive for the market so you go with the next best one?