Re:Would 1950s Living Standards Save Us?
by mdp2021 on Saturday June 18, 2022 @08:21AM
(#31789193)
> Better to try
Who is supposed to «try», and what?
The issue can only be resolved (in terms of political intervention) by a sound, sensible plan acceptable by enough parts.
You want to fix the problem, you have to facilitate that somebody formulates a proposal that enough governments will be available to subscribe to.
No, the fear of annihilation is factually not enough to convince a policymaker - first, guts to head, because of ethology, and second, because of game theory. "Ethology" being a well-dressed encapsulation for "that's how it is - see and evaluate", and "game theory" implying that for a player not to grab the loot a number of reassurances must be in place.
Who is supposed to «try», and what?
The issue can only be resolved (in terms of political intervention) by a sound, sensible plan acceptable by enough parts.
You want to fix the problem, you have to facilitate that somebody formulates a proposal that enough governments will be available to subscribe to.
No, the fear of annihilation is factually not enough to convince a policymaker - first, guts to head, because of ethology, and second, because of game theory. "Ethology" being a well-dressed encapsulation for "that's how it is - see and evaluate", and "game theory" implying that for a player not to grab the loot a number of reassurances must be in place.