Re:Online privacy: to what extent should you try to go dark?
by kornhole on Friday June 17, 2022 @08:23PM
(#31786175)
I agree that political action is needed, but I have almost no hope that any substantive legal changes will pass in near future. Big money and power prevent proposals from getting anywhere. It is up to us to protect ourselves and loved ones. It is a fun sport to evade the surveillance state.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Online privacy: to what extent should you try to go dark?
by wolverine876 on Friday June 17, 2022 @09:21PM
(#31786497)
> I have almost no hope that any substantive legal changes will pass in near future
This is the most popular move against action, to convince people it is hopeless. In fact, when the people want something strongly enough, it certainly happens. There is a long, well-established history of it.
Re:Online privacy: to what extent should you try to go dark?
by kornhole on Friday June 17, 2022 @09:42PM
(#31786610)
I encourage everybody to continue trying, but I am also realistic. I often write my senators and congress people here in California about these issues and proposed bills. They send me back canned letters telling me to pound sand, save the children, blah blah. They are heavily funded by the surveillance capitalists, and the intelligence agencies rely on that data.
Re:Online privacy: to what extent should you try to go dark?
by wolverine876 on Saturday June 18, 2022 @01:06AM
(#31787371)
> realistic
A term people use to justify pessimism, as if that represents reality better than other options such as optimism.