Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future
by politician on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @11:02AM
(#31753988)
Is the environmentalist lobby ready to allow the amount of mining required to produce the copper, nickel, cobalt, and aluminum needed to support going "100% renewable asap"?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future
by ncmncm on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @04:36PM
(#31759133)
The environmentalist lobby doesn't allow or forbid. It has overwhelmingly less power than is projected on it by nuke advocates. Nukes are losing wholly on their own.
Aluminum is the most abundant metallic element on earth. Cobalt demand is already peaking. Copper and nickel have been produced in the millions of tons annually for a century, and will not slow down.
Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future
by atlasunshrugged on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @11:17AM
(#31754242)
They are happy to support it when it is done outside their own country (speaking as an American)
Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future
by politician on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @11:31AM
(#31754516)
By the number of downvotes, I'm going to take away the idea that, no, the environmentalist lobby does not approve of the increases in mining required to support going 100% renewable ASAP.
Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future
by ncmncm on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @04:40PM
(#31759174)
You would have concluded that regardless. And, regardless of any other facts.
Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future
by politician on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @05:46PM
(#31759850)
It's an honest question, but I would challenge you to examine your response critically.