News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:As professors struggle to recruit postdocs, calls for cha... by WkndTriathlete on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @09:12AM (#31752381)
> This is the weakness in your argument. Not all of science is interesting to the private sector.

That's actually a really bad analysis and entirely misses the point.

Fundamentally (in the US) too many postdocs are being funded from a fixed grant pool NIH/NSF/etc. has to offer. Too many professors think their research is so much more important than anything else they hire postdocs for peanuts. Too few postdocs have a career path because so few faculty positions are available after completing their postdoc.

Yes, not all science is interesting to the private sector. But that doesn't mean that publicly-funded science has to proceed at its current rate with its unsustainable model of employing postdoctoral slaves.

Re:As professors struggle to recruit postdocs, calls for cha... by InefficientRed on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @09:18AM (#31752438)
> Too many professors think their research is so much more important than anything else they hire postdocs for peanuts.

Thanks. This is my point. If you want to manage a team of PhDs, especially in STEM, figure out a research agenda that allows you to do that in a fair and reasonable way.

If you want to do things that are uninteresting to anyone outside of one tiny (likely incestual) sphere of grant-committee-political-influence, then do those things with your own time. Don't drag others into it.

BTW: if no one wants to fund this work then what jobs are the post-docs being trained to do?! And if post-docs aren't being trained for useful jobs then why are we taxpayers funding these ostensibly trainee positions?