News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LaMDA is not sentient by kenjackson on Monday June 13, 2022 @07:51PM (#31733146)
The transcripts are impressive. Even knowing it is an AI bot, I still did read it with a bit of "these responses are better than I'd expect from most people I talk to over chat".

I think that the way the Google engineer raised this is probably questionable. But I think that chat quality at that level raises potentially ethical concerns, sentient or not.

Re:LaMDA is not sentient by danachow on Tuesday June 14, 2022 @08:00PM (#31747565)
> "these responses are better than I'd expect from most people I talk to over chat".

And the conversations in sitcoms are so much more witty and refined then real life everyday conversation. This doesn’t prove what you seem to be implying.

Re:LaMDA is not sentient by zardo on Thursday June 16, 2022 @01:46PM (#31768881)
It sounds like the kind of conversation a scientist and an AI would have in science fiction.

Which it would have had plenty of examples of in the training data.