LaMDA is not sentient

Re:LaMDA is not sentient by heyitsguay on Monday June 13, 2022 @06:40PM (#31732663)

You're still making generic arguments, nothing specific to the models in question. I'm a materialist, I believe consciousness is an emergent process that we definitely don't fully understand, but arises from connections of simpler material things. The reason why current-gen large language models aren't conscious (or at least no more conscious than a calculator, in which case you have a definition of consciousness that is not productive for discussing real world phenomena) comes from an understanding of how they work in particular. You don't need to know what each of a billion parameters is doing in an LLM to understand the computational envelope in which it operates, any more than I'd need to understand the ten billion parameters in a 100000x100000 convolution kennel to know that it's not conscious because they just get multiplied with some image region and added up.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LaMDA is not sentient by j-pb on Tuesday June 14, 2022 @03:19AM (#31735744)

Because there is no specific argument to be made. That's the entire point of turings immitation game paper.

It does not matter if your conversation partner is made up of a giant turing machine, a huge set of prolog rules, a giant neural network with a single hidden layer, a really deep transformer, a convolutional kernel, or a bustling pile of ants drawing words into the sand.

When conversing with one another we have the implicit assumption that we are not the only conscious being in existence despite it being a completely subjective phenomena. Everything else would be quite impolite.

Turing extends that (im)politeness to non-human phenomena. So long as there is the appearance of intelligence and consciousness it is the polite thing to assume that there is actually consciousness.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LaMDA is not sentient by vaidhy on Monday June 13, 2022 @08:49PM (#31733526)

What is material here and how far down do you go? By your admission, do you believe in electric and magnetic fields creating emergent behavior - they do not exhibit the same phenomena as something physically perceivable to humans. On the other hand, computer is made up of atoms and molecules and their emergent behavior could give rise to consciousness.

End of the day, you are arguing that since you could explain away the process, it is not conscious.. but you could explain away anything. How is human brain conscious? It is just activation of neurons across a large network. We can even poke electrodes and simulate various feelings.

It would be helpful if you can explain why you believe this to be true rather than what you believe to be true.

[ Parent | on HN ]