News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:15.ai by redredrobot on Monday June 13, 2022 @04:32AM (#31722754)
You're right about the compute part being wrong. I never said it wasn't legal, just that they took someone else's work to train it. I would hope that voice synthesis is illegal without permission from the voice's owner, but I imagine it is untested so far.

But it's not just about the popup - it 's more that when your work is fundamentally about using reusing someone else's character, it feels pretty hypocritical to be so focused on making sure you get credit.

Re:15.ai by deeplearner1 on Monday June 13, 2022 @04:35AM (#31722769)
Just curious. Do you feel the same way about DALL-E and Imagen?
Re:15.ai by redredrobot on Monday June 13, 2022 @04:46AM (#31722826)
If they are used in a tool that lets you generate someone's likeness as part of user-specified new content, yes. But unlike 15.ai that isn't their core purpose and no such tool exists.