News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LaMDA is not sentient by sriku on Monday June 13, 2022 @04:11AM (#31722627)
Wouldn't this be relatively easy if we wanted it? We could just feed it a "time step" token periodically?
Re:LaMDA is not sentient by Tozen on Monday June 13, 2022 @06:13AM (#31723305)
To take that a step further, why couldn't such an AI periodically generate questions to ask itself?

Being good at generating questions, could become almost as important as answering them.

Re:LaMDA is not sentient by jpindar on Monday June 13, 2022 @08:08AM (#31724307)
Would it be posible to run two instances of it and have them talk to each other?
Re:LaMDA is not sentient by Tozen on Monday June 13, 2022 @10:11AM (#31725842)
Yes, they could have multiple instances, go back and forth with each other. This strategy was used with various chess AI in order to help improve it.

However, to make it more human-like, I would think they would make some type of AI self reflection. So like we can talk and think out problems to ourselves, perhaps they would have the AI periodically practice questioning itself, when humans are not around or asking it questions, and do some form of self-analysis.

Re:LaMDA is not sentient by morelisp on Monday June 13, 2022 @06:55AM (#31723633)
The training corpus is atemporal so this would be either meaningless or equivalent to a random prompt.

A chatbot with a sense of time learned by also training with response rates, complete editing sessions, some formalization of interlocution, etc. would be interesting, but that's not what these are.