Let's see:

- He discounts the (financial) value of education

- Deliberately muddles the definition of an asset and a liability

- Suggests commiting tax fraud and participating in insider trading

- Fails to offer any actually good investment advice

The entire premise of Rich Dad, Poor Dad is to move from the ES (Employment, Service) side of his ESBI equation to BI (Business, Investment). This is sound financial advice. You're also confusing tax deferral with tax fraud. Nothing he wrote is illegal.

Yep agree. The negative reviewer clearly didn’t get it.

Have you even read the book? It sounds as if you either didn’t read it or simply didn’t get it.

Which specific point in my comment do you take issue with?

All of them. I get that you don’t like the author. OK that’s fine. But every single counter argument you make is false.

Thanks for the clarification! I will steer clear of this book then.

You might want to take everything with a grain of salt. The book. And the criticism of the book.

The negative reviewer clearly didn’t get the book or for some reason dislike the author. The counter examples are simply false.