Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software
by jhgb on Sunday June 12, 2022 @07:14AM
(#31713632)
Whether "[intercepting] headings and [changing] elevation" is meaningful improvement when the real issue is situational awareness of the automated system (which is obviously the problem with Tesla's system, or any currently existing vehicle automation, really) seems dubious to me. The ability to change altitude instead of just keeping the flight level will not help the automated system avoid an airplane that comes out of nowhere because it's not an environment sensing feature -- it's just a feedback control feature. I strongly suspect that what is controversial about automated car driving systems is not their inability to follow a fixed pre-determined trajectory.
Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software
by mulmen on Sunday June 12, 2022 @12:55PM
(#31716003)
Well flying and driving don’t have much in common so the comparisons break down fast.
Airplanes operate in a completely different environment than cars. Airplanes have radar and radios onboard and rely on ground based information and pre-planning for traffic avoidance. It’s a completely different system.
GM’s vision of self driving cars looked a lot more like the air traffic control system than Tesla’s autopilot.
The fact you think this is exactly why Tesla’s naming choice is so dangerous.
Even antiquated general aviation autopilots can intercept headings and change elevation. This is capability that has existed for decades. GA planes are getting the capability to land now. Airliners have been able to land themselves for decades.