News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starbucks may close its bathrooms to the public again by jamal-kumar on Saturday June 11, 2022 @01:53PM (#31706488)
The access to drugs is a huge thing differentiating but it's also that they didn't close down psychiatric institutions and haven't been in any major wars with a battle-scarred population for a very long time now.

They still have a homeless problem, it's just without exacerbating factors.

Re:Starbucks may close its bathrooms to the public again by thegrimmest on Saturday June 11, 2022 @02:01PM (#31706573)
Right, so we should reopen psychiatric institutions, and harshly prosecute people for property crimes. This has proven an effective strategy to reduce criminality overall.
Re:Starbucks may close its bathrooms to the public again by jamal-kumar on Saturday June 11, 2022 @02:11PM (#31706675)
I think it isn't a very popular opinion to reopen those due to the enormous amounts of abuse that went on in those places. A more progressive approach I feel would be reopening them far away from cities and in nature... Much less like a prison and much more like going to summer camp.

Not prosecuting property crimes has to be the biggest what the hell did they think was going to happen I have ever seen. Impunity is a slippery slope.

Re:Starbucks may close its bathrooms to the public again by moistly on Saturday June 11, 2022 @05:45PM (#31708751)
> due to the enormous amounts of abuse that went on

There’s an enormous amount of abuse in homeless encampments and on the streets. Shutting down psych hospitals didn’t reduce the abuse, it just moved it from a system we’re responsible for and could improve, to an un-system we can ignore and can’t improve. IMO, shuttering the wards was cruel.

Re:Starbucks may close its bathrooms to the public again by thegrimmest on Saturday June 11, 2022 @02:17PM (#31706743)
It's indeed not a very popular opinion, but I think if you ask most people in private, they would happily tolerate the most abusive asylums/penal institutions if they could live in a legitimately polite, safe society, where even minor property crimes are a vanishingly rare occurrence.
Re:Starbucks may close its bathrooms to the public again by jamal-kumar on Saturday June 11, 2022 @02:51PM (#31707066)
Why does it have to be "most abusive" though, like isn't it obvious this just exacerbates problems to anyone with a mote of empathy and foresight?

Maybe you know different people than I do but I don't think that line of thought is as common as you think.

Re:Starbucks may close its bathrooms to the public again by thegrimmest on Saturday June 11, 2022 @02:53PM (#31707097)
I never said they have to be abusive, only that even significant abuse of the violent minority would be tolerated by the peaceful majority. As to why they have to be abusive at all, I would ask you what is the difference between unwarranted abuse and effective operant conditioning?
Re:Starbucks may close its bathrooms to the public again by jamal-kumar on Saturday June 11, 2022 @03:10PM (#31707276)
Yeah, how about neither?

You know there's countries out there which aren't trapped in endless recividism cycles and enormous organized crime recruitment in the penal system right?

Re:Starbucks may close its bathrooms to the public again by harmon on Saturday June 11, 2022 @02:10PM (#31706670)
Honestly, I do think we should reopen psychiatric institutions (although properly funded and regulated this time) and forcibly treat certain people that need help. I don't think it is good or acceptable to allow people with obviously severe mental illness to self medicate with unregulated drugs or alcohol and walk around disrupting society. The current state of affairs works for no one, especially the mentally ill who we could be treating but have chosen not to.

As for property crime, no one wants to live in a society where someone can steal your stuff with impunity, as the broadly supported recent recall of the DA in SF has clearly shown.

Re:Starbucks may close its bathrooms to the public again by bergenty on Saturday June 11, 2022 @02:12PM (#31706684)
Not harshly prosecute people for property crimes but definitely prosecute them.