Re:Explosion at US natural gas plant raises risk of shortage...
by bushbaba on Saturday June 11, 2022 @12:19PM
(#31705649)
To be fair, if we leaned in on nuclear we'd be oil free. I'd much rather deal with highly concentrated nuclear waste than CO2 & Methane emissions
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Explosion at US natural gas plant raises risk of shortage...
by chki on Saturday June 11, 2022 @12:49PM
(#31705925)
Maybe if we had leaned in on nuclear 40-50 years ago. (Even then, Uranium does not grow on trees). But right now, that's not a viable option for the next thirty years. Industrial and Regulatory challenges are impossible to overcome in the timeframe that's needed.
Re:Explosion at US natural gas plant raises risk of shortage...
by bushbaba on Saturday June 11, 2022 @02:33PM
(#31706891)
The USGS has identified US thorium reserves that could meet the WORLD's energy for the next 138 years. I hope in 200 years when or if we run out of nuclear energy that we've managed to find alternative energy sources or leverage space mining.
Re:Explosion at US natural gas plant raises risk of shortage...
by nathanaldensr on Saturday June 11, 2022 @04:04PM
(#31707787)
Another reference for thorium salt reactors: https://www.thmsr.com/en/the-thorium-molten-salt-reactor/
Re:Explosion at US natural gas plant raises risk of shortage...
by mistrial9 on Saturday June 11, 2022 @12:49PM
(#31705921)
> To be fair, if we leaned in on nuclear we'd be oil free
no one knows that -- you think that Exxon and crew are ready to sit down ? They fired their Dutch CEO for trying to make the transition almost twenty years ago IIR
As others in this thread say -- this change reveals the struggles between giants, not the quarrels of simple people in media that happens daily