Re:Nintendo's big piracy case is a sad story
by shakna on Thursday June 09, 2022 @11:36PM
(#31689707)
> "What if I made the worlds worst DRM and then sued everyone who bypassed it?"
Sklyarov was taken to court, and ~I believe is still in jail~, for bypassing Adobe's use of the amazingly secure ROT13 cypher.
EDIT: Charges were dropped a year later, because of the insanity of charging someone for using such an insecure mechanism. But only after both the EFF and Adobe came out in support of Sklyarov.
[0] https://www.zdnet.com/article/dimitry-sklyarov-enemy-or-frie...
Re:Nintendo's big piracy case is a sad story
by kelnos on Thursday June 09, 2022 @09:22PM
(#31688904)
Don't plaintiffs usually also sue to recover attorney/court fees from the defendant if they win? And that usually is granted?
Re:Nintendo's big piracy case is a sad story
by boomboomsubban on Thursday June 09, 2022 @11:22PM
(#31689614)
Almost none of the plaintiffs would ever pay. Like this case, Nintendo is supposed to get ~5 times the amount of money they claim he made. How would he ever pay that, more so while in prison?
Any damages would be eaten up by lawyer's fees. The legal fees are (arguably?) worth it to protect a whole system's games from being freely available but the lawsuit itself would not be profitable.