News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nintendo's big piracy case is a sad story by StrictDabbler on Thursday June 09, 2022 @07:00PM (#31688050)
"What if I made the worlds worst DRM and then sued everyone who bypassed it?"

Any damages would be eaten up by lawyer's fees. The legal fees are (arguably?) worth it to protect a whole system's games from being freely available but the lawsuit itself would not be profitable.

Re:Nintendo's big piracy case is a sad story by shakna on Thursday June 09, 2022 @11:36PM (#31689707)
> "What if I made the worlds worst DRM and then sued everyone who bypassed it?"

Sklyarov was taken to court, and ~I believe is still in jail~, for bypassing Adobe's use of the amazingly secure ROT13 cypher.

EDIT: Charges were dropped a year later, because of the insanity of charging someone for using such an insecure mechanism. But only after both the EFF and Adobe came out in support of Sklyarov.

[0] https://www.zdnet.com/article/dimitry-sklyarov-enemy-or-frie...

Re:Nintendo's big piracy case is a sad story by kelnos on Thursday June 09, 2022 @09:22PM (#31688904)
Don't plaintiffs usually also sue to recover attorney/court fees from the defendant if they win? And that usually is granted?
Re:Nintendo's big piracy case is a sad story by boomboomsubban on Thursday June 09, 2022 @11:22PM (#31689614)
Almost none of the plaintiffs would ever pay. Like this case, Nintendo is supposed to get ~5 times the amount of money they claim he made. How would he ever pay that, more so while in prison?