News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On Stack Overflow's recent battles with the .NET Garbage ... by riffraff on Friday October 28, 2011 @04:36AM (#3167485)
it's great that they share their findings and part of their code, even if I'm not a .NET dev I find the blog posts really interesting and their approach/tools inspirational.

But wasn't slashdot the first high volume site sharing their solutions to performance issues?

Re:On Stack Overflow's recent battles with the .NET Garbage ... by smiler on Friday October 28, 2011 @05:08AM (#3167552)
Notice I said .NET. You can find plenty of presentations / blogs on php performance, ruby / rails performance, python / django performance but not many on .NET - I guess simply because most high-volume sites don't use .NET
Re:On Stack Overflow's recent battles with the .NET Garbage ... by noselasd on Friday October 28, 2011 @09:16AM (#3168094)
I'd say it's rather because most high volume sites using .NET are more commercialized , and often run by companies that's typically not been very open about anything they do internally.
Re:On Stack Overflow's recent battles with the .NET Garbage ... by dbattaglia on Saturday October 29, 2011 @08:05AM (#3171701)
Also StackOverflow are one of the few .Net sites hackers/devs flock to and care about. I work on a large scale .Net web app, but I don't think many hacker news readers would really care about the application itself (and, as you pointed out, my company would probably kill me if I started blogging about the internals!).
Re:On Stack Overflow's recent battles with the .NET Garbage ... by riffraff on Friday October 28, 2011 @05:55AM (#3167633)
Oops, sorry I missed it
Re:On Stack Overflow's recent battles with the .NET Garbage ... by marshray on Friday October 28, 2011 @11:32AM (#3168672)
Yes, I think I remember what you were talking about.

Seemed like /. was one of the first millions-of-hits-per-day site that was heavily dynamic content. All with Perl and MySql, right? I still don't really understand how they do it, but I remember feeling grateful that they were describing it openly.

Re:On Stack Overflow's recent battles with the .NET Garbage ... by mrb on Friday October 28, 2011 @12:46PM (#3168998)
I always assumed Slashdot was pre-generating static files (every few seconds or so, at least of the main top stories) that were served to the users. Isn't that why their comment form said that your comment might not appear until a few seconds after submitting it?
Re:On Stack Overflow's recent battles with the .NET Garbage ... by marshray on Sunday October 30, 2011 @01:32AM (#3173729)
Yes, but there were also profile options to modify your own view, right? So the main page seems at least partially dynamic too.